The Economist explains

Why the capture of a Russian T-90M tank matters

The top-of-the-range model is loaded with the latest tech. Western armies can learn from it

(220509) -- MOSCOW, May 9, 2022 (Xinhua) -- T-90M tanks are seen during the Victory Day military parade to mark the 77th anniversary of the victory in the Great Patriotic War on Red Square in Moscow, Russia, May 9, 2022. (Xinhua/Bai Xueqi)Xinhua News Agency / eyevineContact eyevine for more information about using this image:T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709E: info@eyevine.comhttp://www.eyevine.com

UKRAINE’S RAPID offensive in Kharkiv, in the country’s north-east, brought many prizes. Swathes of territory have been won back and Ukraine’s army captured around a brigade’s worth of military equipment from the fleeing Russians. One of the greatest surprises uncovered was a single T-90M tank. It is one of at least 380 Russian tanks seized since the war began, yet it is uniquely useful. What is the T-90M tank, and why does it matter?

Seizing a weapon can provide valuable insight into the state of an enemy’s military technology. That makes countries protective of their weapons in war. American efforts to inspect the T-72 throughout the Cold War backfired on several occasions, until a rogue Romanian arms dealer sold one to American agents in 1987, supposedly as scrap metal. The deal was later uncovered and made public by the KGB. The prized T-72 had been in service for 14 years before America finally had a chance to inspect it, by which time it had already been superseded. By contrast, the T-90M has been in service for just two years.

This article appeared in the The Economist explains section of the print edition under the headline "Why the capture of a Russian T-90M tank matters"

More from The Economist explains

What are the rules governing protests on American campuses?

They vary, and are hard to enforce

Who is jamming airliners’ GPS in the Baltic?

Russia seems to be the culprit, but it may be inadvertent


What are the obligations of Israel and Hamas to protect civilians?

International Humanitarian Law creates obligations—but contains numerous caveats